Health Home > Nutrition > Canned Tuna vs. Salmon

Canned Tuna vs. Salmon

Prevention

Did you find this helpful?

Rate this article:
92% of users found this article helpful.
By Gloria McVeigh, Prevention
Canned tuna is an easy, convenient protein source, but it's notorious for mercury contamination. Besides its well-known potential for damage to children's developing brains, accumulated mercury may impair adults' immune and reproductive systems and raise heart attack risk.

Try canned salmon or mackerel instead, say Purdue University researchers who tested 272 cans of fish. They found that mercury levels averaged 45 ppb (parts per billion) in canned salmon and 55 ppb in mackerel, compared with as much as 340 ppb in tuna in oil.

If you love tuna, opt for cans labeled chunk light tuna in water. Although they have less healthy omega-3 fats than salmon and mackerel, they averaged only 54 ppb of mercury.
Last Updated: 12/04/2006 16:04:19

Health Resources

help

Featured Expert

Yahoo! Experts share their tips and advice

Joy's Healthy Bite

By Joy Bauer, M.S., R.D., C.D.N.

See All Yahoo Experts »

Yahoo! Health Groups

Join the Conversation

Join a Yahoo! Group and discuss with other memebers in the group. Share tips and experiences

See All Yahoo Groups »

Tip of the Day

Provided by: RealAgeNov 5, 2009

Piling your favorite sandwich fixings on the right kind of bread could mean healthier blood pressure. The right choice? One hundred percent whole-grain.

Read More »

View All Tips »